Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lee Nellis's avatar

Nice to read a commentary about sprawl that doesn't follow the currently fashionable trend of blaming it all on the government.

Note: The well-to-do were sprawling for 30 years or more before the 1920s. And they do set the trend. This is well documented in the archives of the Olmstead landscape architecture firm that are maintained by the National Park Service at the Frederick Law Olmstead NHS in the inner suburbs of Boston.

Observation I: I understand that its hard to write about sprawl without Levittown or Los Angeles, but it happened everywhere, and in some places is maturing and becoming a more complex and interesting story. Where I live, for example, the wealth generated by sprawl has also resulted in the preservation of substantial tracts of wetlands and farmland, also in an extensive trail system that at least offers the opportunity to get places on a bicycle. And the gaps left by the sprawl of the 1960-80s are now infilling at higher densities.

Observation II: While sprawl continues, the current trend in much of the U.S. is to build walkable villages or even new downtowns. I think it is fair to say that those who are paying attention have learned the lesson. But equally fair to say that it took 30+ years after Levitttown for the current trend to really have an impact and it will take that long, give or take, to be counterbalanced.

Expand full comment
David Frost's avatar

Lack of Privacy is a key reason many people leave Urban Areas to seek more Privacy in Suburban Areas or Rural Areas.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts